Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
Overview
- Microsoft
- ASP.NET Core 10.0
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
Bluesky
Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
- 1 Interaction
Fediverse
4/
Three CVEs credited to Joshua Rogers of AISLE Research Team:
― CVE-2026-39457 <https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39457> FreeBSD-SA-26:16.libnv <https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:16.libnv.asc>
― CVE-2026-42511 <https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42511> FreeBSD-SA-26:12.dhclient <https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:12.dhclient.asc>
― CVE-2026-42512 <https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42512> FreeBSD-SA-26:15.dhclient <https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:15.dhclient.asc>
Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
- 1 Interaction
Fediverse
4/
Three CVEs credited to Joshua Rogers of AISLE Research Team:
― CVE-2026-39457 <https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39457> FreeBSD-SA-26:16.libnv <https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:16.libnv.asc>
― CVE-2026-42511 <https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42511> FreeBSD-SA-26:12.dhclient <https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:12.dhclient.asc>
― CVE-2026-42512 <https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42512> FreeBSD-SA-26:15.dhclient <https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:15.dhclient.asc>
Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
- 1 Interaction
Fediverse
4/
Three CVEs credited to Joshua Rogers of AISLE Research Team:
― CVE-2026-39457 <https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-39457> FreeBSD-SA-26:16.libnv <https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:16.libnv.asc>
― CVE-2026-42511 <https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42511> FreeBSD-SA-26:12.dhclient <https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:12.dhclient.asc>
― CVE-2026-42512 <https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42512> FreeBSD-SA-26:15.dhclient <https://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-26:15.dhclient.asc>
Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
Fediverse
@adulau@infosec.exchange @gcve@social.circl.lu For context: #Buildroot has tools to list known vulnerabilities for packages, currently based on NVD data (via https://github.com/fkie-cad/nvd-json-data-feeds).
I noticed it's missing a bunch of vulnerabilities (e.g. CVE-2026-40200, CVE-2026-6042 in musl libc) because the NVD data is missing CPE match information. At the time the CVEs were listed as "Awaiting Analysis", now "Deferred", so I assume it's not going to be added any time soon, if ever (generally the CPE match is present for vulnerabilities in "Analyzed" status). Looking at the GCVE listings was an attempt to find another, hopefully better, source, because an automated check that misses so many vulnerabilities is not going to be very useful.
Today @Bubu@chaos.social pointed me at a similar example: CVE-2025-6020 (note the year), a "high" level vulnerability in linux-pam, which is also marked as "Deferred" in NVD. So we really could use a better source.
We'd need one we can download (rather than query individual packages one by one) without excessive load, but solving that is another matter, first we need a suitable source at all.
Overview
- openemr
- openemr
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
Overview
- openemr
- openemr
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
Fediverse
@adulau@infosec.exchange @gcve@social.circl.lu For context: #Buildroot has tools to list known vulnerabilities for packages, currently based on NVD data (via https://github.com/fkie-cad/nvd-json-data-feeds).
I noticed it's missing a bunch of vulnerabilities (e.g. CVE-2026-40200, CVE-2026-6042 in musl libc) because the NVD data is missing CPE match information. At the time the CVEs were listed as "Awaiting Analysis", now "Deferred", so I assume it's not going to be added any time soon, if ever (generally the CPE match is present for vulnerabilities in "Analyzed" status). Looking at the GCVE listings was an attempt to find another, hopefully better, source, because an automated check that misses so many vulnerabilities is not going to be very useful.
Today @Bubu@chaos.social pointed me at a similar example: CVE-2025-6020 (note the year), a "high" level vulnerability in linux-pam, which is also marked as "Deferred" in NVD. So we really could use a better source.
We'd need one we can download (rather than query individual packages one by one) without excessive load, but solving that is another matter, first we need a suitable source at all.