Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
- 5 Interactions
Fediverse
Based on something @cR0w mentioned I wanted to know: Are there CVE records are out there with E:[UP] but that are eitw?
Well, yes. One or two. Or three:
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68820
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55040
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50522
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45659
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41091
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33824
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21525
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21519
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21513
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-20805
(and many more that aren't CVE-2026-*).
... ok, are there any that aren't MS?
Yes, a handful:
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68686
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48788
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42475
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44168
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4428
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4427
For no particular reason:
4.5.3.1 CNAs SHOULD update published CVE Records when information material to the Record changes, for example, when a Fix becomes available.
(data may be incomplete & some FPs may have slipped through, this was some quick & dirty regex work)
Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
- 5 Interactions
Fediverse
Based on something @cR0w mentioned I wanted to know: Are there CVE records are out there with E:[UP] but that are eitw?
Well, yes. One or two. Or three:
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68820
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55040
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50522
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45659
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41091
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33824
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21525
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21519
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21513
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-20805
(and many more that aren't CVE-2026-*).
... ok, are there any that aren't MS?
Yes, a handful:
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68686
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48788
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42475
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44168
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4428
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4427
For no particular reason:
4.5.3.1 CNAs SHOULD update published CVE Records when information material to the Record changes, for example, when a Fix becomes available.
(data may be incomplete & some FPs may have slipped through, this was some quick & dirty regex work)
Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
- 5 Interactions
Fediverse
Based on something @cR0w mentioned I wanted to know: Are there CVE records are out there with E:[UP] but that are eitw?
Well, yes. One or two. Or three:
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68820
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55040
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50522
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45659
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41091
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33824
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21525
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21519
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21513
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-20805
(and many more that aren't CVE-2026-*).
... ok, are there any that aren't MS?
Yes, a handful:
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68686
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48788
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42475
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44168
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4428
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4427
For no particular reason:
4.5.3.1 CNAs SHOULD update published CVE Records when information material to the Record changes, for example, when a Fix becomes available.
(data may be incomplete & some FPs may have slipped through, this was some quick & dirty regex work)
Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
- 5 Interactions
Fediverse
Based on something @cR0w mentioned I wanted to know: Are there CVE records are out there with E:[UP] but that are eitw?
Well, yes. One or two. Or three:
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68820
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55040
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50522
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45659
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41091
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33824
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21525
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21519
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21513
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-20805
(and many more that aren't CVE-2026-*).
... ok, are there any that aren't MS?
Yes, a handful:
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68686
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48788
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42475
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44168
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4428
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4427
For no particular reason:
4.5.3.1 CNAs SHOULD update published CVE Records when information material to the Record changes, for example, when a Fix becomes available.
(data may be incomplete & some FPs may have slipped through, this was some quick & dirty regex work)
Overview
Description
Statistics
- 1 Post
- 5 Interactions
Fediverse
Based on something @cR0w mentioned I wanted to know: Are there CVE records are out there with E:[UP] but that are eitw?
Well, yes. One or two. Or three:
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68820
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55040
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50522
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45659
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41091
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33824
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21525
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21519
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21513
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-20805
(and many more that aren't CVE-2026-*).
... ok, are there any that aren't MS?
Yes, a handful:
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68686
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48788
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42475
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44168
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4428
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-4427
For no particular reason:
4.5.3.1 CNAs SHOULD update published CVE Records when information material to the Record changes, for example, when a Fix becomes available.
(data may be incomplete & some FPs may have slipped through, this was some quick & dirty regex work)